What Makes it Spin?

January 11, 2012

by: Tami O’Connor – Taken From Litetronics

What is a Radiometer?

The radiometer is a light bulb-shaped device containing an object that looks like a weather vane (wings arranged in a circle like spokes of a wheel).  Developed to measure the intensity of radiant energy, or heat, the radiometer will:

  1. Help you understand the principles of energy conversion.
  2. Show how heat and mechanical energy are products of energy conversion.

Most of us don’t realize how important energy is in our lives.  In actuality, every facet of our life involves energy.  One of the reasons we tend to take energy for granted is that it is constantly changing from one form to another.  We call this change conversion.

During this conversion, energy is changing to and from potential and kinetic forms of energy.  Potential energy is the energy stored in matter; kinetic energy is the energy of motion.  In all energy conversions, the useful energy output is less than the energy input.  This is because some energy is used to do work, and some energy is converted to heat.

Sir William Crookes invented the original radiometer in the mid-nineteenth century.  The device was developed to measure the intensity of radiant energy, or heat.

What causes the vanes of the radiometer to spin?  The atmosphere inside a radiometer is a nearly perfect vacuum.  More than 99% of the air has been removed, leaving only thousands of air molecules inside the radiometer compared to the trillions of air molecules in the outside atmosphere.  The “lighter air” inside the radiometer means that the air molecules are able to move about more freely.

The opposing sides of each vane within the radiometer are alternately dark and light in color.  As light (infrared radiation) hits the vanes, the lighter side reflects the light while the dark side absorbs it.  As the dark side absorbs the radiant energy, a difference in temperature develops between the vanes.  The freely moving air molecules bounce off the dark side with a great deal of energy.  As the air molecules “kick” away from the dark side of the vane, they form convection currents and momentum transfer causing the vanes to spin away from the side from which they kicked (that is away from the dark side of the vane).

Stronger light means that more energy will be absorbed on the dark side, and the air molecules will “kick off” faster and with greater force.  Therefore, as the light gets brighter, the vane begins to spin faster and faster.

Fun Activities to Try With Your Radiometer

Sunlight is responsible or many things, including the production of our food.  Plants use energy from the sun to drive the chemical change in the leaves of plants.  Plants act as an energy converter, and they can change the light energy into chemical energy that plants use to grow.

The following experiments also demonstrate an energy conversation.  This conversion begins with light energy that is changed into mechanical energy and heat.  In all energy conversions, the form of energy changes from a more useful type to a less useful type of energy.  Eventually all of the energy that we use will end up as heat, which is the least useful form of energy.

Always remember to be careful while using your radiometer.  Because it is made of glass, it may break if handled roughly or dropped.  If the radiometer does break, contact an adult immediately to clean the broken pieces.

Experiment #1

What light source works best?

Materials: Flashlight, lamp with an incandescent bulb, mirror

Put you radiometer under different light sources including sunlight.  Which light source makes the radiometer spin the fastest?

Experiment #2

What angle works best?

Hold the radiometer in different positions so light strikes it from different angles.  What angle gives the greatest motion to the vanes?

Experiment #3

Does a mirror increase the intensity?

Use a mirror to add additional light to the radiometer.  Does the mirror make the vanes spin faster or slower?  Why do you think that is?  Try holding the mirror at different angles to add light from different directions.  How does that change the rate of motion?

Experiment #4

Does the radiometer need direct sunlight?

Materials: Flashlight, lamp with an incandescent bulb, mirror, various colors of colored cellophane or colored plastic

Your goal is to find out if the radiometer still spins when the light source has to pass through a colored cellophane or colored plastic.  Use the different light sources from Experiment #3, but place the colored cellophane or plastic between the light source and the radiometer so the light has to pass through it.  Do certain colors allow more light though to make the vanes spin faster?  Do the vanes spin faster or slower with the colored cellophane or the colored plastic?

Experiment #5

The radiometer and heat energy.

Materials: Hair dryer

Use a hair dryer to direct a stream of heat toward the radiometer.  Do the vanes turn at all?  And if so, what happens after a few seconds?  How is this energy source (the hair dryer) different than light energy?

Experiment #6

Will wind affect the radiometer?

Materials: fan or drinking straw

Using the drinking straw or fan, blow air at the radiometer.  Can you get it to turn?  Why or why not?

Experiment #7

Your turn… Can you devise an experiment?

It is your turn to be the scientist.  Now that you know about the radiometer, can you devise an experiment using it? Decide what you’re testing for and test your results!

Educational Innovations sells radiometers for $9.95.


Coupled Pendulums

December 2, 2011

by:  Martin Sagendorf

One Pendulum…

Is interesting, but…

Two Pendulums…

Are much more interesting.

 

But Only If…

They are coupled together.

An Easy Way Is To…

Couple them at their pivot points.  This is accomplished by hanging the two pendulums from a horizontal string.

There Are…

Many illustrations of coupled pendulums on the web; search for ‘coupled pendulums’ – but the fine points of making a really successful demo are rarely discussed… so before we start:

Some Guidelines:

-       Make the pendulums absolutely identical: both the rod lengths and the mass values (the lengths are measured from the pivot points to the C.G. of the masses)

-       Use rod lengths of at least 1/3 meter (13”) – so the pendulums don’t swing too quickly

-       Use masses of at least 75 g (1 oz) – to provide a long swing time

-       Space the vertical supports for a horizontal string length of 500 to 600 mm (20 to 24 in.) – weighted or clamped-down ring stands will work – and will work especially well if their top ends are joined by a solid bar to minimize vibrations

-       The string should be fairly taunt – for example:  a 13 to 15 mm (1/2 to 5/8 in.) droop in the center with two 75 g masses hanging 100 mm (4 in.) apart

-       Use pendulum spacings of 75 to 125 mm (3 to 5 in.) – experiment for good results

-       For the best results, symmetrical setup spacing is critical – try to achieve positions symmetric within 4 mm (1/8 in.)

-       When pulling a pendulum to the side, two things are very important: first, don’t pull it too far (a mass rise of 75 mm (3 in.) is fine); second, the pendulum must be pulled at precisely a right-angle to the string

-       For the following exercises, when two pendulums are raised, they should be raised to the same heights

With Two Identical Pendulums:

Center the two pendulums with the pair spaced about 100 mm (4 in.) apart

-       (A.)  Raise and release one pendulum

Question:  What happens?  Why?

-       (B.)  Raise (on opposite sides) and release both pendulums

Question:  What happens?  Why?

With Three Identical Pendulums:

Center the three with a space of about 75 mm (3 in.) between each

-       (C.)  Raise and release the center pendulum

Question:  What happens?  Why?

-       (D.)  Raise and release one of the outer pendulums

Question:  What happens?  Why?

-       (E.)  Raise (on the same side) and release both outer pendulums

Question:  What happens?  Why?

-       (F.)  Raise (on opposite sides) and release both outer pendulums

Question:  What happens?  Why?

So Far…

We have dealt with identical pendulums… but what happens if we:

-       (G.)  Make a pendulum with a greater mass (but the same length) and use it in place of one of those

above

Question:  What happens?  Why?

-       (H.)  Make a pendulum just slightly longer (say, 20%) than one of the three and use it in place of one of

the pendulums above

Questions:  What happens?  Why?

In Action:

Construction Notes:

-       The horizontal string must be firmly attached (tied, hooked, or taped) to the vertical rods

-       The pendulum rods are made from coat hanger wire or from welding rod

-       Hooks are formed in the pendulum rods using a pair of pliers

-       The masses can be any object that can be affixed to the rod – preferably an object through which a hole can be drilled and, for easy identification during demonstrations, the masses should be different colors

In This Apparatus:

-       Length of horizontal string = 600 mm (23-1/2”)

-       Length of pendulum rods (from inside hook to far end) = 440 mm (17-7/16”)

-       Diameter and material of pendulum rods = 1/8” brass welding rod

-       Thread on end of pendulum rod = 6-32 for a length of ¾ in. (Note 1)

-       Nuts = brass 6-32 knurled (2 per rod)

-       Small mass = 5/8” x 2-1/16” steel rod (75 g) – 3 required (Note 2)

-       Large mass = 1” x 1-3/4” steel rod (175 g) – 1 required (Note 2)

-       Distance from inside of pendulum rod hooks to the centers of masses = 400 mm (15-7/8”)

Note 1:  A No. 6 screw diameter is 0.138”. – the 1/8 in. welding rod is 0.013” less – this is OK

Note 2:  Drilled thru No. 29 (0.136”)

A Comment on Dimensions:

The overall dimensions are not critical, but the apparatus should be large enough to be easily viewed in a classroom setting.

A Definition:

These are ‘Simple Pendulums’ because they are not ‘ideal’: i.e. their masses are not concentrated at single points and the restoring force is not a constant – however they do exhibit ‘Simple Harmonic Motion’.  This motion is an approximation at small angles – it is sufficiently accurate for our purposes.

And Further:

The details of Harmonic Motion and Simple Harmonic Motion are fascinating – the details of both can be found in any physics textbook.

‘Resonance’ is defined as the building up of large vibrations by the repeated application of small impulses whose frequency equals one of the natural frequencies of the body – in this case, a pendulum.  Identical pendulums are required to provide maximum energy transfer.  The mechanical energy is transferred by the ‘pulls’ on the supporting string – this is rather like a child’s swing where ‘pushes’ applied at the correct times will ‘add’ and act to increase the swing amplitude.

In Summary:

These demonstrations provide vivid illustrations of energy transfer between two and three resonant bodies.  Even better, additional pendulums, various masses, and variations of excitation will provide more interesting demonstrations and bases for experimentation.

Marty Sagendorf is a retired physicist and teacher; he is a firm believer in the value of hands-on experiences when learning physics.  He authored the book Physics Demonstration Apparatus.  This amazing book is available from Educational Innovations, Inc. – it includes ideas and construction details for the creation and use of a wide spectrum of awe-inspiring physics demonstrations and laboratory equipment.  Included are 49 detailed sections describing hands-on apparatus illustrating mechanical, electrical, acoustical, thermal, optical, gravitational, and magnetic topics.  This book also includes sections on tips and hints, materials sources, and reproducible labels.


Two Prisms – Four Demos

November 26, 2011

by: Martin Sagendorf

Most everyone knows that an equilateral prism will refract white light into its constituent colors: a spectrum ranging from red to violet.  But, if one uses an additional prism, there’s much more to be discovered.

All that’s required:

-       a source of white light

-       a slit mounted on a large piece of cardboard

-       two equilateral prisms

-       two small pieces of card stock

-       a square of ground glass.

SIMPLE REFRACTION

The light source and slit are arranged as shown.  A fairly narrow (1/4”) color spectrum will be displayed on the ground glass.  Note that the light beams are DIVERGENT.

DOUBLE REFRACTION

The color spectrum from one prism is now passed through a second prism.  The various color beams are further spread to result in a somewhat wider (5/16”) spectrum display on the ground glass.  The light beams are even further DIVERGENT.

A SINGLE COLOR EXPERIMENT

Isaac Newton wondered if any single color of a spectrum could be further broken into more colors.  To investigate this, he placed ‘STOPS’ in the light beams between the two prisms – allowing only one color to pass to the second prism.  The result was that once white light was broken down into its constituent colors, the colors could not be further broken down.  Here only one STOP is used – leaving only red, with a small fringe of blue.

RECOMBINING SPECTRUM COLORS

Isaac Newton also wondered if the colors of the spectrum could be recombined to again make white light.  To do this he used a second prism arranged as shown.  He proved that this was possible.  What’s interesting is that the light beams exiting the second prism are not on the same line, but they are PARALLEL.  And, because the slit is not infinitely narrow, these beams are not infinitely narrow and therefore can mix to create white light.

THE COMPONENTS

  • A 100 Watt halogen bulb provides a good light source.  It must be shielded because the room light should be a low-level to see the spectrums on the ground glass.  As shown, a box top is used – a fully enclosed bulb would be better, but there must be provision for removing the heat generated (about 90 Watts for a 100 Watt bulb).  Experiment to find a slit width that works well for your set-up.

  • Two razor blades (single or double-edged) spaced with their edges about 1/32” apart make a good slit.  Tape the blades over a one inch by ¼ inch cutout in a piece of cardboard.  And be sure to use black tape to cover any openings in the blades.
  • Two equilateral prisms.
  • Two 3” x 3” square pieces of thin cardboard to act as STOPS.
  • A 2” x 2” or 3” x 3” piece of ground glass or frosted vellum paper.  Ground glass is easily made using automobile engine valve lapping compound – place some compound between two pieces of ordinary window glass and rub them together.  Only one side should be frosted.  The sharp edges and corners of the glass pieces can be ‘broken’ with fine sandpaper wrapped around a small piece of wood.

NOTES:

A standard tungsten filament light bulb will not work as well as a halogen bulb – the halogen provides a much better spectrum.  Rotate the bulb to obtain the highest illumination of the slit.

The STOPS can be hand-held or taped to small blocks of wood.  In either case, the vertical edges that block the light must be parallel to the color lines so only one color is passed.

The ground glass can be taped to a small piece of wood – in this case, the vertical dimension should be increased to 3”.

It is important that the heights (the centerlines) of the bulb filament and the slit be the same.  And since the bulb’s filament will be four or five inches above the bench top, some large books or other flat objects can be stacked so the vertical center of the optical components match the center height of the slit.

The distances shown in the illustrations work well.  The distances to the ground glass can be increased for larger images, but with subsequent decreases of image intensity.  Obviously, a darker room will allow easier viewing of fainter spectrums.  As shown in this photo:

The spectrums shown are slightly curved because the prisms’ faces are very slightly curved.

IN SUMMARY

These are great demos in that they not only illustrate some fundamental properties of light, but that they also provide for many variations of the set-up.  The distances and angles shown provide a starting point for experimentation.  For example, increasing the distances will enlarge the spectrum display – but, which works best to do this?

IN THE CLASSROOM

These experiments can be done as a demo for the class as a whole, but even better, since the components are so inexpensive, several set-ups can be provided for lab groups of three or four students.  Equally fun for the instructor is the creation of the lab worksheet guiding the students through the investigations.

Marty Sagendorf is a retired physicist and teacher; he is a firm believer in the value of hands-on experiences when learning physics.  He authored the book Physics Demonstration Apparatus.  This amazing book is available from Educational Innovations – it includes ideas and construction details for the creation and use of a wide spectrum of awe-inspiring physics demonstrations and laboratory equipment.  Included are 49 detailed sections describing hands-on apparatus illustrating mechanical, electrical, acoustical, thermal, optical, gravitational, and magnetic topics.  This book also includes sections on tips and hints, materials sources, and reproducible labels.


If you Want a Good Thermometer, Don’t Use Your Body

November 26, 2011

by: Martin Sagendorf

An Easy Question:  Which is warmer – which is cooler?

In the strictest sense, it’s a matter of energy.  And we use temperature as a measure of energy level.  As we all know, the greater the energy level, the higher the temperature… But, although this is absolutely true; sometimes it’s not exactly what we perceive in everyday life.  When asked, we all can testify that when we touch a piece of metal we’ll say it feels cold.  But is it really cold?  Is it or isn’t it ‘cold’?

The Answer Is…

… very simple.  If the piece of metal is at room (ambient) temperature it cannot be ‘cold’ – it must be at the same temperature as the temperature of the room.

But First:

Let’s discuss ‘perceived temperature’: this is what we ‘think’ the temperature is.  It isn’t always the actual temperature (of the object we touch).  Thus we enter a wonderful combination of both physics and biology.  Physics describes the absolutes.  Biology describes the biological reactions (interpretations) of our physical world.

It’s a matter of thermal conductivity and our nerves.  Some materials are good conductors of heat (energy) and some are not.  Our nerves sense only temperature – so if thermal energy is rapidly removed from the tissues surrounding our nerve endings (like at our finger tips), our nerves sense that the temperature ‘they feel’ is cooler – e.g. the material is removing thermal energy from the body tissue surrounding the nerve ends at a rate faster than our body can re-supply energy to the tissues – thus our nerves sense this as ‘cooler’.

Now:

A truly illustrative and memorable way to present the question:

Use a construction that provides a means of ‘feeling’ the temperature of three different materials: all three of differing thermal conductivities – low, medium, and high – a simple box having squares of ceramic, wood, and aluminum.  The ceramic and aluminum pieces exhibit nearly the same thermal conductivity, but the aluminum has just a little better thermal conductivity.  The wood has a relatively low thermal conductivity.

This box is 17” wide, 8” high, and 3” deep.

In The Classroom, Discuss:

Thermal energy in materials

Temperature (as a measure of thermal energy)

Conductivity (of thermal energy)

[note that you haven’t yet presented the biological aspect of the students’ upcoming measurement of what’s warmer or cooler]

The Exercise:

Begin by drawing a three column ‘Vote List’ on the classroom board (ALUMINUM – WOOD – CERAMIC).

[this is a little of a deliberate distraction, but flip the switch to ON and count to five seconds before starting]

Have the students, one-by-one, ‘test’ (by touching) the three materials and marking their vote on the board.

Total the votes.

Ask the class if this makes sense… that the aluminum (or perhaps the ceramic) piece is the coolest?  Ask, “Why is this so?”… “Is it because the metal or ceramic is heavier?”… Or, “Is it because the wood is darker in color?”

Now, turn the box to show its insides – that there’s nothing inside the box.  The three pieces of material MUST be at the same temperature! – Room Temperature.  If any students still doubt you, use an IR thermometer to prove your point!

And Finally:

The really fun part of the lesson:  Ask the class, “Why did so many people think that one material is ‘cooler’ than the other two materials?”  Don’t give the answer – guide the discussion – let the class discover the answer.

Marty Sagendorf is a retired physicist and teacher; he is a firm believer in the value of hands-on experiences when learning physics.  He authored the book Physics Demonstration Apparatus.  This amazing book is available from Educational Innovations – it includes ideas and construction details for the creation and use of a wide spectrum of awe-inspiring physics demonstrations and laboratory equipment.  Included are 49 detailed sections describing hands-on apparatus illustrating mechanical, electrical, acoustical, thermal, optical, gravitational, and magnetic topics.  This book also includes sections on tips and hints, materials sources, and reproducible labels.


Make Your Own Time

October 10, 2011

by: Martin Sagendorf

A Definition:

Clocks measure time – it can be a continuous measure of events passing or the measure of the interval between two events.

Of Hours:

After years of evolution, our modern clocks now divide the day into 24 equal length hours.  And, as we know, there are two systems in use today: Americans use the “double-twelve” system while the rest of the world uses the 24 hour system.

As An Aside:

The word “hour’ comes from the Latin and Greek words meaning season, or time of day.  A “minute” from the medieval Latin pars minuta prima (first minute or small part), originally described the one-sixtieth of a unit in the Babylonian system of sexagesimal fractions.  And “second” from partes minutae secundae, was a further subdivision on the base of sixty – i.e. “a second minute”.  (ref. Pg. 42 The Discoverers by Daniel J. Boorstin)

The “Double-Twelve” Clock Face:

Has 12 at the top – probably because at noon the sun is at its highest point in the sky.

But…

We can make a clock with 12 o’clock anywhere we wish and the clock will still work just fine.

Here we have a clock with 12:00 where 5:00 usually is.  Now, if the hour hand points to 12 and the minute hand points to 2, the time would be 10 minutes past 12.

Or:

We can rearrange the face:

Or:

We can replace the numbers:

Or:

We can divide the day into ten hours (times 2).

Suitable Clocks & How:

-       Good candidates are battery operated clocks with face diameters of 8 inches or less.

-       There are a variety of these clocks – all I’ve seen can be disassembled if one is careful.  When a front cover face must be removed, it is usually secured by three small tabs at the inner part of the face – use a worn common screwdriver to gently pry inwards, over a tab location, between the side of the cover face and the clock body – this will release the tab and allow the cover face to be gently ‘worked’ outwards.  Other clock designs are held together by multiple screws from the rear – be careful, some of these have real glass for the cover face.

-       The hands can be pried-off by using one’s fingernails on opposite sides of the hub of each hand.

-       A new dial face should be of ‘card stock’ (8-1/2” x 11” is readily available) – standard weight paper is too light.

-       A dial face must be a little smaller (1/16” on the diameter) than the opening into which it is placed – this will prevent buckling from expansion due to high humidity.

-       The dial face can be hand-drawn or computer-generated (using any of the popular computer drawing programs).

-       A punch or a craft knife can be used to cut out the center hole.

-       Sometimes the original dial face can be removed – sometimes not – it is not really necessary.  In either case, multiple small pieces of double-sided tape are used to fasten the new dial face.

-       When reinstalling the hands, they must be synchronized – the easiest way to do this is to set (press on) all the hands pointing to the (original) 12:00 position.

And More:

Over the years I, and my students, have made dozens of different clock faces – there seems to be never-ending variations.  You, and your students, will think of many different ones – just think of anything that represents numbers.  And, what’s neat is that each individual clock can have the maker’s name and/or school name included on its face.

Marty Sagendorf is a retired physicist and teacher; he is a firm believer in the value of hands-on experiences when learning physics.  He authored the book Physics Demonstration Apparatus.  This amazing book is available from Educational Innovations – it includes ideas and construction details for the creation and use of a wide spectrum of awe-inspiring physics demonstrations and laboratory equipment.  Included are 49 detailed sections describing hands-on apparatus illustrating mechanical, electrical, acoustical, thermal, optical, gravitational, and magnetic topics.  This book also includes sections on tips and hints, materials sources, and reproducible labels.


The Tipping Point

October 6, 2011

by:  Ron Perkins

The bottle balancer is a fascinating conversation piece that illustrates the principle of center of gravity!  A small hole in an oak board allows you to balance a 2-liter soda bottle at an angle that appears to defy gravity. This can be used as a teaching tool or a centerpiece at your next party!  Hold the special angle cut of the wooden, bottle balancer board against a flat horizontal surface.   When a full, sealed, 2-Liter soda bottle is inserted into the wooden hole from above, it will catch the bottle flange and the wood/bottle assembly balances at a surprising angle.

Explanation:

In order for an object at rest to NOT tip over, its center of gravity, or its center of mass must be directly over its base.   A goose-necked desk lamp is usually quite stable, unless it is configured so that the lamp part is stretched horizontally, far from the large base.  Then, it becomes less stable and often tips over.   The wood/bottle assembly example is more complicated than the lamp example because if the bottle is moved, the flowing liquid results in a change of its center of mass.

Consider a thought experiment!  To simplify the Soda Bottle Balance, consider the soda in the bottle frozen and the bottle super-glued to the wooden board so that everything balances on the angled edge of the board.  Balancing will only occur if the center of mass is directly above the flat angled edge of the wood.    How do you find the center of mass?  Loosely tie a string to your forefinger with a hanging weight tied to the other end of the string, e.g. a large metal nut or a bunch of washers.  Balance the object (in this case, the glued and frozen bottle balancer) on your forefinger above the string.    The center of mass will be somewhere along the straight line that includes the string.    Then, balance the wood/bottle assembly on your forefinger at a different point.    Again, the center of mass will be somewhere along the straight line that includes the string.    Where the two lines intersect is the center of mass.   This imaginary point must be directly above the object’s base in order for the object to be stable and not tip over.   Sometimes the center of mass is within the object and sometimes it is a point in space outside the object, as in the wood/bottle assembly.

What happens when you release the carbon dioxide gas from a balanced 2-liter soda bottle?   A sealed 2-liter soda bottle has a mass of more than 2000 grams of material and contains about 10 grams of carbon dioxide under pressure (Wikipedia).   If the bottle is opened and the gas released, the mass of the bottle becomes less by about 0.5%.   However, approximately half of this decrease in mass is to the left of the center of mass and half to the right. The release of gas results in very little change in the center of mass.   In trying the experiment, one must find a method of slowly releasing the gas in the bottle without disturbing its balance.   One method would be to make an extremely small hole in the balanced bottle by pressing a small hot needle into the bottle, allowing gas to slowly escape without losing liquid. This way the bottle assembly stays balanced as the gas begins to slowly leak from the bottle.   Observe what occurs!  Sounds like an interesting experiment!    Please let Educational Innovations know the results!

Note:   

As the pressure is released, the bottle may sag causing the soda to flow, drastically changing the center of mass of the bottle.   Also, if the gas is released too quickly, foaming will occur as dissolved gas quickly comes out of solution, resulting in loss of liquid.


The Law of Dulong and Petit

September 3, 2011

by: Dr. Jean Oostens

Atoms were proposed in antiquity without any experimental evidence by Democritus, a Philosopher.  This must have been a problem for Newton and Leibnitz who posited that there was always a mean of considering smaller and smaller intervals of space to calculate the “instantaneous velocity”.

The introduction of the precision balance in chemistry by Lavoisier paved the way for Dalton to formulate his laws on the “definite and multiple proportions” governing chemical reactions.  This supported the atomic theory, without giving it general acceptance.

Specific heat was defined as the quantity of heat needed to increase one gram of a substance by one degree.  There was no definite pattern when specific heats of various substances were compared.  Until two French scientists, Dulong and Petit in 1819 calculated specific heat by atomic mass.  There appeared a number of cases where the results were quite similar: about 6 calorie per mole.  This was equivalent to stating that any atom is as good as any other to store heat!  This was a small step towards acceptance of the existence of atoms.   An explanation for this, and the reason for the exceptions, had to wait the early 20th century explanation by Albert Einstein.  By that time, atoms had gained wide acceptance from the work of Rutherford, and soon by Bohr.
—————————————————————————————————————

The Lesson:

You are given several chunks of metal, each containing 0.6 1024 atoms (i.e. one mole) of one element.   How will each of those samples, when dropped in a standard quantity of hot water (typically 200 mL and 70 C) affect the temperature?

Step 1  Use a good balance (at least 0.1 gm resolution) to determine which element you are dealing with.  If possible confirm your identification with an additional cue.

Step 2 . Select one of the computers available, and look at the readings of the two temperature probes (lower left corner of the screen).  They will tell which pair of element your are assigned to investigate.

Step 3.  Prepare your two standardized water containers.  Fill the two Styrofoam cups with equal amount of tap water. Check that the two temperature sensors read the same within 0.1 C.   Then bring the two cups to the microwave oven and heat for 2 minutes.  Exchange the positions of the cups in the microwave oven and repeat another 2 minutes of heating (this will uniformize the temperatures).

Carefully bring back the two cups (the water may be very hot) to your station and insert the temperature probes into their respective cup.  You need to note which cup is to receive the required element (Gold => Yellow and Silver => Grey for example).   When the probes reach an equilibrium, after 5 to10 seconds, verify that the two temperatures match within a degree or less.  If necessary, use a 60 mL syringe to transfer water from one cup to the other and then the other way.  The idea is to have the same quantity of water at the same temperature within reason.

Step 4.  Start the measurement.  Hit the “START” button with the mouse and wait 10 to 15 seconds during which an horizontal line should appear, with both traces nearly on top of each other (if this is not so, go ahead anyway: you can always get another chance).

Drop your two samples the same time, one in each cup and watch until the completion of the three minutes.

Compare your results with the other teams’ and draw conclusions of the exercise.

This experiment on Dulong and Petit Law was performed by the students of Professor Shuffett’s Chemistry class at Lindsey Wilson College (Columbia, KY). It uses the mole set from Educational Innovations and takes advantage of existing data acquisition capabilities at that college.

About the Author:  After 20 years of research in Particle and Nuclear Physics, Dr. Oostens included in his activities, teaching at several college and universities all over the US. After moving to Kentucky 17 years ago, he co-founded a local Alliance, STASCKY (Science Teachers Alliance – South Central Kentucky).  He hasserved as STASCKY’s secretary since its inception.

For more than forty years he has kept a small research activity in collaboration with Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.  His involvement there started when Dr. Louis Rosen started a non-programmatic (i.e. not defense) group to attract more talents from all over the world. In 1970, he invited Dr. Oostens to participate in that project as the first non-American to work there. Dr. Louis’ idea was predicated on a high intensity 800 MeV accelerator called LAMPF (for Los Alamos Meson Proton Facility). Later on, the proton beam was used to create a flexible neutron source, LANSCE, that attracted a variety of researchers from all fields.


How to Make a Rocket (Scientist)

July 1, 2011

by:  Tami O’Connor

A few months ago I had occasion to conduct two hands-on workshops for elementary and middle school teachers at the NSTA National Convention in San Francisco on behalf of Educational Innovations.  One presentation focused on film canister rockets.  This is a tried-and-true way to teach Newtown’s First and Third Laws of Motion and also brings to light concepts such as the four forces of flight; thrust, drag, weight, and lift.  It also reinforces instruction on 3-D shapes and 2-D plane figures such as circles, cones, cylinders, rectangles, and triangles.

I presented the lesson to the teachers in much the same way I would to my students.  The first thing we did was to brainstorm the features all rockets have.  After a bit of discussion it was agreed that they all have a nose cone, a cylindrical body, fins, and an engine.  I then handed out a paper template imprinted with the pattern of a nose cone and fins, a regular 8½ x 11 sheet of white paper, a piece of goldenrod paper, and a white translucent film canister.  Also required are scissors, tape, ¼ piece of an Alka Seltzer tablet, and paper towels.

The only canister that works with this rocket is the type that has the lid that fits snugly inside the canister.  The canisters that have a lid that wraps around the outside rim, however, will not allow enough pressure to build up inside the chamber.

The first step in building a film canister rocket is to construct the body of the rocket.  The easiest way is to curl the white 8 ½ x 11 paper into a cylindrical shape using the film canister (without the top) as a guide.  The paper can be rolled around the film canister and then taped along the edges.  The easiest way to recover the film canister is to blow into one end of the rolled cylinder, forcing the canister out the other end.

When I conduct this activity I am careful not to offer any suggestion as to whether students should roll the paper in the long or short direction, nor do I discuss how much tape should be used.  The results are very interesting.  Students (adults and children) are very creative, especially when they are not bombarded too much instructional advice.

At this point, you should use Scotch tape to affix the film canister to the cylinder.  This is one of the most critical steps.  First, the canister must have the open end extending far enough from the end of the cylinder so that no tape overlaps the opening of the canister.  If any tape extends over the opening, the lid will not form a complete seal, and sufficient pressure to launch the rocket may not build up.  Second, if the canister is not taped securely, it will launch into the cylinder and propel only the canister rather than the entire rocket.

The next step is to cut out a nose cone and fins.  I use the attached template in my workshops.  The nose cone is actually a circle with a ¼ pie slice cut out.  For those old enough to remember, it closely resembles a Pac Man figure.  The nose cone is made by curling the PacMan so the edges of the missing pie piece begin to overlap forming a cone shape.  Though the template I passed out had cut lines for the nose cone and fins, I give very little direction as to the size of the nose cone or the total number of fins each student should use.

When the construction of the rocket is finally completed, it’s time for the launch!  I have students lay the piece of goldenrod paper on their desk and clear from the launch area any papers or other things that might get wet.  I invite students one at a time to the front of the room so everyone can see the results of their construction techniques.  During teacher workshops where time is limited, I have everyone launch at the same time.

When we’re ready to launch I hand out approximately ¼ piece of an Alka Seltzer tablet.  It is important when working with students to remind them not to put anything in their mouths (especially Alka Seltzer!).  Since the Alka Seltzer is the last step in the process I have students place the tablet piece on the desk and leave it there until I specifically tell them to pick it up!

While holding the rocket upside down students are instructed to fill an eyedropper or pipette with water and add a squirt or two into the film canister.  The amount of water is not critical in the grand scheme of things.

The next step is far more critical, so it is important that students are paying attention at this point.  Once the Alka Seltzer is added to the water in the film canister, it will begin to fizz and give off Carbon Dioxide gas.  The total release of gas is not immediate and therefore will continue for more than a minute which allows plenty of time for the student to secure the cap onto the film canister.  If students become flustered and attempt to jam the top onto their canister while holding the paper cylinder portion of their rocket rather than holding the canister portion they will likely damage their rocket.  Thirty seconds is much longer than most people think.  Having the students relax is the key!  The important thing to remember is to grip the rocket around the film canister and NOT the paper cylinder.

Once the top of the canister is secure the rocket should be placed in the center of the goldenrod paper and the student should step back and wait.  The results are wonderful!!!  Inside the closed film canister pressure continues to build until the container can no longer contain it.  At this point, the top separates from the canister.  Since the top is unable to move with the table behind it, the rocket is propelled upward with a loud popping noise.   Since Goldenrod paper is an indicator for bases, students will notice the launch pattern that is left behind on their launch pad!  Kids find this almost as cool as the rocket launch!

After the activity is over students will note with interest which rockets flew the highest.  This is when the true lesson begins!  Here is the opportunity to identify the many variables and the effects of each variable on the rockets’ flight characteristics.  Examples will include the width of the nose cone, the length of the cylinder, whether any excess paper from the cylinder was trimmed and discarded, and the amount of tape that was added to the rocket during construction.

Since the film canisters are reusable, and the construction materials are quite inexpensive, students should be given the opportunity to redesign their rockets based on discoveries they made during the launch trials and the class discussion.  This is one activity that generates so much enthusiasm with every age group that I fit it in whenever possible.  I’ve brought this activity to Girl Scout meetings with varied ages, Daisys to Cadettes. And with 16 years of teaching experience from 1st grade to 7th, I managed a successful launch in each and every class!  This activity is so adaptable that there is certainly no shortage of learning!


Invite Newton Into Your Classroom

May 28, 2011

by: Matthew Morris

Newton was a revolutionary thinker of his time. He is responsible for the three laws of motion that we still use today;

1. Objects that are not in motion remain stationary unless acted upon by another force.

2. There is a direct relationship between the force acted upon the object and the mass of that object times the acceleration the object feels (F=ma).

3. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

Nobody before Newton could explain why objects acted the way they did, but with these three laws he quantified movement in terms everyone could understand.

But there was a problem with his theory; if all motion had to be caused by some force acting on it, then why do objects fall towards the earth when you release them from a fixed position? This free falling object was in fact free, meaning free of outside forces acting upon it (besides wind resistance). There were no visible forces acting upon that object. So why do they move downward if nothing is acting on it? But Newton explained this motion with gravity. He said that gravity is a force that the earth has upon all objects, something invisible that pulls us down at all times at a constant acceleration. There is a myth that the way Newton thought of the idea of gravity was when he was thinking about it under an apple tree when an apple fell on Newton’s head and at that moment, he figured out that there must be a force pulling the object down. This is also why apples are used to demonstrate Newton’s force, but no one knows definitively if the myth is true or not.

At the time Newton didn’t know that the acceleration of Earth’s gravity would later be calculated at approximately 9.81 m/s2. Also, at the time, he couldn’t explain what this force was made of, but only that it was invincible and constant. It was many years later that Einstein explained gravity with the theory of relativity stating that space and time were really one thing called spacetime, that bound all objects together like a web such that when an object has mass, it stretches the spacetime causing objects around it to feel a ‘pull’ towards the center object. Also Einstein discovered that this force increases as the outer object gets closer to the center object. Think of it like a blanket being stretched really thin and a ball being placed in the center and another ball being rolled across the blanket from one side to the other. This would cause the one moving ball to move towards the ball in the center because of the bend in the blanket, or spacetime.

So, looking back at Newton and the apple, the earth’s mass causes a big bend in spacetime, which causes other objects, such as apples, to be pulled downward at all times, even when they are on the ground already. Hey, something has got to keep them from floating upward.

Now that we’ve explained the motion, let’s define it in equations so that we can predict how the object will act during a free falling motion. The first and most important thing to remember about free falling objects is that the mass doesn’t matter. A bowling ball and a pencil will fall, or accelerate at the same rate towards the earth. Meaning if you go on the roof of your building and drop a bowling ball and a pencil off of it at the same time, they will hit the earth at the same time. But someone might say, “What about a feather? It won’t fall at the same speed as a bowling ball.” And they would be right. But what they are forgetting is air resistance. The bowling ball has very little air resistance because it is very aerodynamic, but the feather is not very aerodynamic. If you were to repeat this test in a vacuum then the resistance due to air (drag) would be removed as a factor, and the objects would fall at the same speed and hit the ground at the same time.

So back to the equations; Using calculus, we can start with the equation for the acceleration of gravity and integrate an equation to define the velocity of the object and then integrate it again to find the position of the object. If we define x as time measured in seconds, then the equation for the acceleration of the object looks like this A(x) = 9.81. One might notice that there is no x in the actual equation and this is because no matter how long the object is falling, the acceleration of the object at any time will always be 9.81 m/s2. So by integrating that function of x, we get V(x) = 9.81x + C. In this case, we are defining the velocity of the object in a function of time. C represents any starting velocity of the object, such as if the object was thrown downward. This can also be defined as V0, or initial velocity.  Then if we integrate that function again we get a position function that looks like this, S(x) = 4.905x2 + Cx + K. In this last equation, K represents an initial position, such as if you defined the height of the object being 10 meters above the starting point, then K = 10. And C still represents the initial velocity.

From these equations, we can know that, if we eliminate the wind resistance, any object, the free falls for 1 second will have an acceleration of 9.81 m/s2, a velocity of 9.81 m/s, and a position of 4.905 m. After 2 seconds it will have an acceleration of 9.81 m/s2, a velocity f 19.62 m/s, and a position of 19.62 m. And at 3 seconds, an acceleration of 9.81 m/s2, a velocity of 29.43 m/s, and a position of 44.145 m. You can predict all of these values at any time using these equations just by plugging in the number of seconds into x.

Keep in mind that all of these equations are generalizations of free falling objects. Certain objects, in real life, because of wind resistance, will fall at different rates. Also, due to wind resistance objects will reach something called terminal velocity where the velocity cannot go any higher because the wind speed it feels restricts any increase in velocity. For humans, the terminal velocity is typically around 54 m/s or about 120 mph. For a raindrop it is around 25 m/s. Also, the earth’s gravity, though seemingly constant, isn’t actually constant. It has very miniscule changes as you change locations on the earth’s surface due to the density of the Earth at that spot. But these changes are so small students shouldn’t even bother trying to account for them.

So, what is a Newton anyway? It is the force created by the weight of an average apple (mass of approximately 102g). Technically speaking, a Newton is the force required to accelerate a mass of 1 kilogram at a rate of 1 Meter per second per second.  What better way for your students to visually understand Sir Isaac Newton’s idea of F=ma, than to drop a 1 Newton foam apple onto someone’s head? They will remember it forever!    Educational Innovations sells The Newton Apple as singles and in a five pack.  The five pack includes a full Starter Guide, which includes experiments to conduct using the Newtown Apple, information about Sir Isaac Newton, and information about the Newton as a unit.

Experiments For Your Students:

Elementary/ Middle School Students

1.     Have students hold their hand straight out. Ask them to describe what they feel on their hand. Then place the Newton’s Apple on their hand. Ask them to describe what they feel on their hand now. Ask them what they think will happen if another apple is added to their hand.  Ask them to explain why this is the case.

2.     Take a Newton’s Apple and a pencil or another small object and weight each object so the students can see the difference in weights. Ask them to predict what would happen if you dropped the objects from the same height at the same time (i.e. which would hit the ground first?). Have a student release the objects at the same time from the same height. Ask the students to describe what happens. Try to relay the concept that the mass of the objects didn’t really matter because no matter what they weigh, the objects will still fall at the same speed and hit the ground at the same time.

3.     Repeat the same experiment as before but use something with a lot of air resistance, such as a piece of paper. Then crumble the paper up into a ball and drop both objects again. This time explain to the students that because the paper had a lot of air resistance before, it took longer, but then when it was made in a ball, the paper was still the same weight but now less air resistant.

High School Students

1.     Take a block of wood and tie it to a piece of string. Then tie the other end of the string to the Newton’s Apple. Put the block of wood on a table and then hang the Newton’s Apple over the edge. Make the table surface smooth enough that the block will slide, but not too fast. This experiment is to demonstrate friction between two surfaces and how it would affect the almost free falling object. Place the block on a table with a different surface (one that is less smooth).  Notice the difference.

2.     Attach a spring to a pole or hanger such that the spring can dangle freely. Then attach the Newton’s Apple to the other end of the spring. Pull down the Newton’s Apple so that when you release the Newton’s Apple it will move up and down in a continuous pendulum-like motion. Ask the students to describe the motion and to predict what would happen if you double the weight at the end of the spring. Add a second Newton’s Apple to the end of the spring and repeat the motion of the spring by pulling down the Newton’s Apples the same distance as before.


When You Want Your Students To Make Noise!

April 30, 2011

by: Tami O’Connor

On a field trip with my 5th grade students to a local science museum, we saw one of the science instructors conduct a lesson on sound. It was such a simple idea, with easy-to-find materials, that I brought it home to do with my Girl Scout troop the following week.  Since then, I have modified and expanded the lesson so it would fit any elementary or middle school grade lesson plan on sound.

The first thing students must understand is the simple concept that vibrations create sound.  Even very young children can grasp this concept.  You can conduct a number of activities using tuning forks and such, but the easiest demonstration is to have students touch the front of their throats and hum.  Once they understand that the vibration of the molecules in an object creates sound, they find it easier to understand that sound cannot travel through a vacuum (an area devoid of matter).

The lesson I conducted started off with a single piece of yarn.  Each child was given a 12-inch length and asked to make sound with it.  Generally speaking, very few of my students were successful.  Some realized that, by holding one end of the yarn in one hand, and then running the yarn between the nail of their thumb and pointer finger of the other hand they produced a faint sound.  This was a good beginning!

Next, I gave the students a coffee cup, a paper clip, and a pencil.  I asked them to punch a small hole in the bottom of the cup with the point of the pencil and to thread the yarn through the hole.  They knotted the end of the yarn inside the cup to one end of the paper clip and then pulled the paper clip to the bottom of the cup. The paper clip was flush with the bottom of the cup, and the yarn extended from the bottom of the cup, like an animal’s tail.

While doing this, many students realized that, when they inadvertently ran their hand along the yarn, a sound emanated from the cup.  Without any additional instruction, the children began to experiment on their own.  After a short time, I gave every other student a small cup of water. I instructed them to wet their yarn in the water, without wetting the cup.  As these students ran their hand (or, better yet, their thumb nail) down the yarn it was clear that the sound became significantly louder.

What’s the science behind this activity? The friction between the yarn and students’ fingers caused the yarn to vibrate.  Because there was no way initially to amplify the sound, it remained faint.  As soon as students attached the yarn to the cup, however, the sound became much louder.  This is because the sound waves resonated within the cup and were amplified.  This is the principle at work when children play “telephone,” by stringing two cups across a distance.  The cups amplify the vibrations carried by the string to the listener’s ear.

Similarly, children can change the pitch of the sound by changing the size of their mouth.  This leads to the next step of the lesson.  I distributed aluminum cans of various sizes and had the students attach the yarn to the bottoms of the cans in the same way we did with the cup.  The results should be obvious.  The smaller cans produced a higher pitch while the larger cans produced a deeper and richer sound.

The final activity in my lesson involved Talking Tapes.  These tapes are utilized in much the same way as the yarn in my original lesson. By running their thumb along the plastic strip, students can actually make a paper or plastic cup talk! These tapes are specially molded so that, when vibrated in just the right way, they produce audible speech. And, nothing creates a “buzz” in a classroom like tapes that “talk” to the students!

The principle is the same as a diamond needle traveling through a record groove (if you remember records!).  The Talking Tapes include five assorted phrases and say such things as, “Science is Fun”, “Happy New Year”, and “Be My Valentine”.  Educational Innovations carries Talking Cups and a plethora of other Super! Wow! Neat! materials to teach sound in your classroom!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.